Re: [sidr] is a longer announce invalid or not found?

Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Mon, 03 October 2011 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3722721F8B14 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 04:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.366, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aSvGGI4-Wjrx for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 04:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092A21F8B0A for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 04:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id p93BI9Cv030599; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:18:09 -0500
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p93BI9wB022249; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:18:09 -0500
Received: from SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([192.168.0.104]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:18:06 -0400
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:18:06 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m21uuuqw9g.wl%randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030714390.8756@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <m2d3eilpnq.wl%randy@psg.com> <20110930101754.GB10004@juniper.net> <m2ehyytj2l.wl%randy@psg.com> <20110930122831.GA10176@juniper.net> <m2bou2t7x5.wl%randy@psg.com> <3B65FD95-2E66-4D1F-B630-976ECE99050A@ericsson.com> <m2sjndsrs5.wl%randy@psg.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D213914A3308B30@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <m2mxdlsqzu.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2ipo9sqlg.wl%randy@psg.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1109301651080.3100@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <m2hb3tsq58.wl%randy@psg.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030437470.8756@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <m21uuuqw9g.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-X-Sender: sandy@mailbin.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2011 11:18:06.0395 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FC930B0:01CC81BE]
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] is a longer announce invalid or not found?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:15:08 -0000

No, just trying to figure out what you were saying.  With my first 
interpretation of you message, what you were suggesting was not possible. 
That's hardly a twitch or fine detail.

I think I've got you straight now.

--Sandy, speaking as regular ol' member

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Randy Bush wrote:

> you don't think a router can sign a pks42 or whatever request without
> the private key leaving the router?  or is it that, as a plain old wg
> member, are you really asking for an email beating this into the ground
> with every twitch specified to the finest detail?
>
> randy
>