IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] Call for WG Adoption

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> Fri, 18 August 2023 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10673C151084; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WAT6-qri2U6y; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dane.soverin.net (dane.soverin.net [185.233.34.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF173C151072; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RRzS62P7szyZm; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:00:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RRzS55q4rzFk; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:00:37 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1692356438; bh=lds4OEFQP/999eEk9he9cCOGXEATrGHzj8KLkvo1nZU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=XO5G7bONdrTxFQ4rbM7ICBphnWvnly6kiXC4VNTMYs7RgsY/bMT9pEXJ9+l74K0lJ VV7QesLGjHt554pXCfdiEUmCaDtULN1jB4jJpNsmpLS/LO18oKUCrAYg48eB+ylfOT VhKZa05HLqExtAop8TUZLatinGYgejxbar8uwRuqNWHjoYs84BtGiONSyNIVdmbFna Ct2Fb0tBWq3i62SEv8PrQvy/biqTnM5O3QQXqwmJdDff+F6iG8JWbRQPrQ6APk/agl a/U4olwa1KnAzU0t9IwScoSFusX5sGl6llk25DNB6MXk4q1bwZKR9NMM2Q7mJBpJyD 8n6PCsTvIEuiQ==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
X-Soverin-Authenticated: true
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4dffe5a0-d9d8-810e-a3e1-44d230bc06a7@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 13:00:27 +0200
Cc: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>, sidrops-chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3CE32F9E-D131-44A5-BEFF-34C91A1EE938@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <SJ0PR09MB6336E53386223537AA76E7589803A@SJ0PR09MB6336.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <4dffe5a0-d9d8-810e-a3e1-44d230bc06a7@foobar.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=ArIonsxP c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64df4f56 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=a-SJ-uLkAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=B_R0llEliXCDJMfdkQwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yc4HgI7j53qWSGAcJiko:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-Cloudmark-Reporter: pE+Vd808iI+6Spy3Ydar43E+i+4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/4ws4gqBR-svf2tN9s2nV-RTMxAk>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:00:45 -0000

Hi Nick,

> On 26 Jul 2023, at 15:42, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Borchert, Oliver (Fed) wrote on 25/07/2023 02:04:
>> Hello all,
>> Following up on today’s presentation during the IETF 117 SIDROPS meeting, we would like to request working group adoption for the following two informational drafts:
>> * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-timbru-sidrops-vrp-notation/
>> * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-timbru-sidrops-aspa-notation/
> 
> No problem with the idea, but could they not be combined into a single draft?  Each ID on its own is rather short, and they're effectively declaring a common syntactical approach to mapping relationships between RPKI entities.

We went for separate documents because we wanted to prevent fate-sharing where discussion on one definition (or, in the case of ASPA, the fact that the profile is not yet RFC) can lead to blocking progress on the other.

Furthermore, although having separate documents adds some process and review overhead, these documents are fairly trivial. So, it was felt that this additional burden should be quite minimal.

Finally, other object types can also benefit from this kind of notation, e.g., router keys and ghostbuster records, with more types expected in future. It may confuse readers if some definitions are combined in one document whilst others have their own.

That said, I am not fundamentally opposed to merging if the working group feels strongly.

Tim




> 
> Nick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email