Re: [Sidrops] AD review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress.
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 04 March 2020 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C183A087E for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:47:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gim_hiAtHJd for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5813A0863 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1j9avY-00052Y-Oy; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 20:47:36 +0000
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 12:47:36 -0800
Message-ID: <m2sginn8yf.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ60FSiMC1XOctAjzFSQV0wgYqdjwNM0L_eiSARmYEPbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJ60FSiMC1XOctAjzFSQV0wgYqdjwNM0L_eiSARmYEPbw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/9kX2esiJV_5SsaQOhhJNn6KI-Bo>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] AD review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress.
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 20:47:47 -0000
> 1: The document says: Updates: 6811 (if approved) please add a > sentence to the Abstract saying how / what it updates in 6811. stole your text, tyvm, but added to intro not abstract > 2: Please use the updated (RFC8174) requirements language - I've > included it below for easy copy-n-paste. sure > 3: Please include an index - assuming you are using xml2rfc, <?rfc > toc="yes" ?> should do it for you.... you are welcome for the now less short document > 4: Help my understand / justify why this is Standards Track and not > BGP or Informational. The Shepherd writeup just says Standards Track > with no explanation as to *why*. I suspect that the "Updates: 6811" > might be the justification/ ask warren. he might have a good explanation. :) but i do not believe this belongs in the document. whack me otherwise. -01 published randy
- [Sidrops] AD review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egre… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Sidrops] AD review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] AD review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-… Warren Kumari