Re: [Sidrops] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm-00.txt]

Job,

Thanks for initiating this work.

As one of the original SLURM co-authors, I am in support of adoption of it as WG item and I volunteer to work on it as co-author. 

Di

> 2023年2月24日 00:23，Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> 写道：
> 
> Hi Job, all,
> 
>> On 23 Feb 2023, at 14:03, Job Snijders <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> While working on running code implementations to support RFC8210bis in
>> StayRTR and OpenBGPD, it dawned upon us that SLURM for ASPA wasn't
>> specified yet.
>> 
>> This below submission serves to compliment the existing body of work
>> related to ASPA, and barring any complications, it might be good to try
>> to make this part of the I-D cluster draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis,
>> draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile, & draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification.
>> 
>> If the WG & chairs think this make sense, I'd like to ask for a call for
>> Working Group Adoption for draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm.
> 
> I think this should indeed be done.. I have mentioned this on occasion, and quite recently I asked about this explicitly here:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/-mGfZYT7IcVSGB8vPuwkWvENy0c/
> 
> As one of the original SLURM co-authors I volunteered to work on it, and asked if the WG agrees that it's needed. I got little response to this. As a result talking to the other co-authors, and drafting a proposal did not make it to the top of my todo list yet. Given the lack of responses I am a bit surprised that there is now a document.
> 
> As for the content. It is not clear through the references how the Validated ASPA Payloads (VAPs) are made, and fed into RPKI-RTR (8210-bis). There is a reference related to VAP to draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-12, which in turn refers to draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-11 for this. The latter document does not mention VAP.
> 
> This is important if we are to understand what the format should be for the aspa filter and local assertions. In particular, we need to know whether a VAP is modelled after the 8210-bis section 5.12 ASPA PDU. Or.. that, like Validated ROA Prefixes, it's a tuple of (customer-as, provider-as, optional afi limit) in which case as single ASPA object would contain multiple VAPs, and other ASPA objects could contain some of the same VAPs, as well as additional VAPs. I would then expect these to be combined to form the appropriate ASPA rtr PDU.
> 
> I think we need clarity on this before the SLURM data format can be decided on.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Feedback, suggestions, pull requests & text are welcome too.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Job
>> 
>> ----- Forwarded message from internet-drafts@ietf.org -----
>> 
>> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 04:57:19 -0800
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> To: Ben Cartwright-Cox <ben@benjojo.co.uk>, Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm-00.txt
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Job Snijders and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name: draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm
>> Revision: 00
>> Title: Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management (SLURM) with RPKI Autonomous System Provider Authorizations (ASPA)
>> Document date: 2023-02-23
>> Group: Individual Submission
>> Pages: 9
>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm-00.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm/
>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  ISPs may want to establish a local view of exceptions to the Resource
>>  Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) data in the form of local filters
>>  and additions.  This document defines an addendum to RFC 8416 by
>>  specifying a format for local filters and local assertions for
>>  Autonomous System Provider Authorizations (ASPA) for use with the
>>  RPKI.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sidrops mailing list
>> Sidrops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
> 