Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-prefer-rrdp-00.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7913A23FE for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrcxSL_iOClE for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04FC3A23FC for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1lPqQL-0003Ul-32; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:39:05 +0000
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:39:04 -0700
Message-ID: <m2v99dstl3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ties de Kock <tdekock@ripe.net>
Cc: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2B8DFACB-E2C6-48F6-B2DF-D762FCAF2384@ripe.net>
References: <161403751321.2598.9484858333244233389@ietfa.amsl.com> <76D4E3AD-97BD-40D5-804C-3ED6B875044F@nlnetlabs.nl> <2B8DFACB-E2C6-48F6-B2DF-D762FCAF2384@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/LrNY0v3dy6WQDIrtzazHjhgygh0>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-prefer-rrdp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:39:23 -0000

> We observe that rsync clients update infrequently (~hourly) and RRDP clients
> update frequently. The majority of clients in our logs check notification.xml
> every 10 minutes. We also see that HTTP failures are temporally correlated,
> clients detect a failure (in CDN or backend) at the same time.

would this not be distributed over the ten minute poll distribition?

randy