[Sidrops] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers-04: (with COMMENT)
Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 20 May 2025 13:08 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sidrops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.226] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9117B2AAC83C; Tue, 20 May 2025 06:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.40.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174774652148.480395.8429074922360546375@dt-datatracker-59b84fc74f-84jsl>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 06:08:41 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 2LRG3LLGSBF3DTJRUFMMRYKOZNHF7S2W
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2LRG3LLGSBF3DTJRUFMMRYKOZNHF7S2W
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-sidrops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Subject: [Sidrops] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers-04: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/Vbtm1Sb0IcFSaGx9Nkp6aq7d4tU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:sidrops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sidrops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sidrops-leave@ietf.org>
Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Nancy Cam-Winget for their secdir reviews. Section 5: List RFC 9286 here. It appears that it is the RFC which requires manifestNumber to be strictly increasing. Section 5: Can a short paragraph be added discussing the issues associated with either the 'CRL Number' not matching the 'manifestNumber' (currently only RECOMMENDED) and/or the issue of not ignoring a CRL Number if and when it doesn't match the 'manifestNumber'. Nothing too long, just a short note that outlines the issues. I can help with the words for this, if that would help.
- [Sidrops] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf… Deb Cooley via Datatracker