Re: [Sidrops] WGLC draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06 ends 12/17/2019

I've re-read the document and I support publication.

1) its non-normative, it doesn't attempt to use MUST/MAY language, its
written as an informative pointing to the normative RFCs.

2) I don't see it as altering any substantive quality in 'bits on the
wire' or format of ASN.1 or any other high risk change, instead it
helps guide how to interpret what you see, and how to understand what
you should do.

3) I think its a useful contribution, especially for anyone walking
into the situation cold, unsure how to read and understand the
collection of documents which apply.

-George

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Christopher Morrow
<christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> howdy folks!
> The authors of  draft-ietf-sidrops-rp have made some changes related
> to previous comments/questions/etc and would like to move the document
> along provided issues are properly addressed. Let's take a 2wk period
> to read and review, comment and raise concerns if there are any
> remaining.
>
> Thanks!
> -chris
> co-chairperson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops