[Sidrops] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time-06: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done on this document.

Minor regret about the shepherd's write-up as it lacks the justification for
the intended status.

Like noted by other ADs: the goal of an abstract is not to repeat the
introduction but be a concise 10-line-max summary of the document.

In section 2 `Publishers and RPs SHOULD adhere to the following guidelines`
when can this SHOULD be bypassed ? Same comment applies to many "SHOULD" in
this document.