Re: [Sidrops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-06: (with COMMENT)
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 19 April 2022 21:15 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57423A0122; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-yDaRHUjgUQ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4323A02BB; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ngvC8-0018kY-Bp; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 21:15:32 +0000
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:15:31 -0700
Message-ID: <m24k2opyfg.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net
In-Reply-To: <165039859882.4772.8718431308370982924@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165039859882.4772.8718431308370982924@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/iRcv2tjvPzLUFbDhJirL8TvLZUY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 21:15:40 -0000
> Thank you to Kyle Rose for the SECDIR review.
indeed
> ** Section 2
> Given sufficient external, i.e. non-RPKI, verification of authority,
> the use of RPKI-based credentials seems superfluous.
>
> Consider rephrasing this sentence to clarify the application of these
> credentials. For example:
>
> Given sufficient external verification of authority (through non-RPKI
> mechanisms), the use of RPKI-based credentials is superfluous for
> <explain the application>.
Given such external, i.e. non-RPKI, verification of authority, the
use of RPKI-based credentials adds no authenticity.
> ** Section 4.
> Attempts to use RPKI data to authenticate real-world documents or
> other artifacts requiring identity are invalid and misleading.
>
> Recommend describing what is mean by “invalid”. In the cryptographic
> operation sense, these signatures are “valid”. They were just
> “misleading” in terms of the degree of authenticity they are
> providing.
Attempts to use RPKI data to authenticate real-world documents or
other artifacts requiring identity, while possibly cryptographically
valid within the RPKI, are misleading as to any authenticity.
other wording solicited.
randy
- [Sidrops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [Sidrops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on dra… Randy Bush