IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10.txt

Michael Haardt <michael.haardt@freenet.ag> Fri, 05 December 2008 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866893A6774 for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRNtHPWNct2h for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66493A6BBF for <sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mB5He2i9045062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:40:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id mB5He2vJ045061; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:40:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [195.4.92.90]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mB5HdoMQ045040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:40:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from michael.haardt@freenet.ag)
Received: from [195.4.92.27] (helo=17.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID exim) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #65) id 1L8eeb-0007hl-0N; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:39:49 +0100
Received: from nostromo.freenet-ag.de ([194.97.7.6]:43969) by 17.mx.freenet.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #68) id 1L8eea-0000XL-Vp; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:39:48 +0100
Received: from michael by nostromo.freenet-ag.de with local (ID michael) (Exim 4.69 #72) id 1L8eea-0006Ak-D8; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:39:48 +0100
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:39:48 +0100
To: leiba@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10.txt
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
References: <5F91404A622256149CBA0E1C@Uranus-009002042072.watson.ibm.com> <E1L8ceo-000674-Pc@nostromo.freenet-ag.de> <79C6FF0EEFEEF8B5519D8C87@Uranus-009002090249.watson.ibm.com> <E1L8dFh-00068F-Rr@nostromo.freenet-ag.de> <EEE3ED343B28005896349EFD@Uranus-009002090249.watson.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEE3ED343B28005896349EFD@Uranus-009002090249.watson.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.1 6/15/06
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E1L8eea-0006Ak-D8@nostromo.freenet-ag.de>
From: Michael Haardt <michael.haardt@freenet.ag>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> > I disagree and would appreciate adding
> >
> >   It is up to the implementation if ":from" sets the parameter value.
>
> Absolutely not.
> It is critical that the value represent the *owner* of the script, and that is 
> the *only* criterion that's relevant.  The "from" might or might not be the same 
> as the owner, and has no direct bearing on this.

If the owner has multiple addresses, he may want to use a certain one.
Do I get you right in that the choice MUST be made outside Sieve and
the implementation MUST NOT use the value of ":from" for a hint?

If so:

  The sender address specified by ":from" MUST NOT set the parameter
  value, the value MUST be set by the implementation to the owner of
  the script.

That would be consistent with the choice of the token, but as you can
see from my first interpretation, something needs to be said about this.

Michael

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status