IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sieve] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve... autoreply, notify-presence, vacation-seconds

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Thu, 14 October 2010 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30983A6C0D for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZiaGnTbwKxZ for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE133A6C0C for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1287094121!63277440!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
Received: (qmail 371 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 22:08:41 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-12.tower-120.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 22:08:41 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9EM8wNG022341 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:08:58 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9EM8r36022256 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:08:53 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9EM8ZnW006939 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:08:35 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9EM8X2L006893 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:08:33 -0400
Received: from [135.70.214.141] (vpn-135-70-214-141.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.214.141]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20101014220833gw100ei1b1e> (Authid: tony); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:08:33 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.214.141]
Message-ID: <4CB77F60.6000006@att.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:08:32 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <AANLkTik994DjP7T7tj-VzJQ4J1nAgtq4hTdj5ZFQ-h=u@mail.gmail.com> <4CB4F39A.8040806@att.com> <01NSZ2PTFXCI000CVY@mauve.mrochek.com> <AANLkTi=4K21-vdL3B2jQ95QvF2JjZPKLqBS93HRU8R3X@mail.gmail.com> <4CB66F01.9040504@att.com> <AANLkTi=QHwchFBEJcAgqQ=+6yQBAnE-5LYonpOmEhvEH@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=QHwchFBEJcAgqQ=+6yQBAnE-5LYonpOmEhvEH@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sieve mailing list <sieve@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sieve] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve... autoreply, notify-presence, vacation-seconds
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:07:33 -0000

On 10/14/2010 2:56 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I think it's just easier to include
>>
>>         unknown - the correct value could not be determined
>>
>> in the appropriate places.
>>      
> OK.  I still disagree with you, but it's not worth arguing about: as
> you say, it's easy to put it in.
>
> I'll add it, and post the next rev now.
>    

Thanks.

< below; Note
 > below; note
or
 > below. Note

After status definition, add

unknown - The correct availability status could not be determined.

If you add the unknown definition, the entire "Note that in addition" 
sentence phrase can be removed.

     Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email