Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions
Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org> Mon, 15 December 2008 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC3028C122 for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JM4rNfT4TrUX for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC81228C0F3 for <sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mBFK2nAN049422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:02:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id mBFK2nZ1049421; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:02:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mBFK2mSf049415 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:02:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from lisa@osafoundation.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271AF77D6FE; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:02:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6J+q8GuJ2dAm; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:02:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [74.95.2.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B9E77D6FD; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:02:47 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Message-Id: <E4177C4D-4262-41F1-8D76-FCD028CE83CC@osafoundation.org>
From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
To: Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault@commerce.net>
In-Reply-To: <DB38CCF0-1590-4768-99C9-7F0002DCF5AC@commerce.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:02:47 -0800
References: <DB38CCF0-1590-4768-99C9-7F0002DCF5AC@commerce.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Ok, so there's already CHECKSCRIPT, which leaves me even more clueless why ADDSCRIPT would be defined to operate differently while anonymous, rather than just be disabled. Lisa On Dec 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > Anonymous mode: > > Implementations MAY advertise the ANONYMOUS SASL mechanism > [SASL-ANON]. This indicates that the server supports ANONYMOUS > SIEVE > script syntax verification. Only the CAPABILITY, PUTSCRIPT and > LOGOUT commands are available to the anonymous user. All other > commands defined in the base ManageSieve protocol MUST give NO > responses, however ManageSieve extensions MAY allow other commands > in > the ANONYMOUS Sieve script verification mode. Furthermore the > PUTSCRIPT command MUST NOT persistently store any data. In this > mode > a positive response to the PUTSCRIPT command indicates that the > given > script does not have any syntax errors. > > This conflates two things (which is generally bad for > extensibility): anonymous authentication, with script syntax > verification. It would be better not to conflate these things, in > case there is ever any other purpose to anonymous mode, or any need > for script syntax verification while authenticated. How about a > TRYSCRIPT method that acts as PUTSCRIPT but never stores the > script? Then the anonymous mode can be defined, in this version of > managesieve, as allowing TRYSCRIPT but not PUTSCRIPT. > > > Lisa
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Lisa Dusseault
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Alexey Melnikov
- ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Lisa Dusseault
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Alexey Melnikov
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: ManageSIEVE review: conflating two functions Alexey Melnikov