Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-sieve)
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 24 May 2008 07:31 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192153A687F for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pf8A-FR+Roo2 for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3DC3A67E6 for <sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4O7OZoT087727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 May 2008 00:24:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m4O7OZMc087726; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:24:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4O7OXQo087699 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:24:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from alexey.melnikov@isode.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (atomnet2.ttr.ru [195.245.249.86]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SDfCrwA4EZim@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 24 May 2008 08:24:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4837C2B3.8080304@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 11:24:35 +0400
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
CC: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-sieve)
References: <480F17C6.6040404@isode.com> <4836C34B.1030700@isode.com> <01MV4RRQJI7Q00007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <23290.1211585629.941276@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
In-Reply-To: <23290.1211585629.941276@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Dave Cridland wrote: > On Fri May 23 16:40:57 2008, Ned Freed wrote: >>> Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>> > While this is a Lemonade WG document, this document is of >>> relevance to >>> > the Sieve WG mailing list and should be reviewed here. >>> > >>> > So please review >>> > >>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-sieve-05.txt> >>> >>> > before May 5th. >>> I haven't seen any reviews of this. Can you please send me a quick >>> "I've >>> reviewed it and it looks fine" or "this needs more work" to me, if >>> you've done a review. >> I finally had a chance to look at this. Having done so, the question >> I really >> want to ask is has anyone implemented this, and if they did, how >> well did it >> work? And if the answer to that is "no implementations yet", I'd then >> like to >> hear if anyone is planning to implement this, and if so, when and for >> what >> puropse? > The whole thing just leaves me a quivering mess, whimpering in a > corner and yearning for the good old days, when if one APPENDed > message literal in a MULTAPPEND set was accepted, one could breathe a > sigh of relief and use LITERAL+ to do heavy pipelining on the rest. > > I'm still not entirely sure how IMAP-SIEVE would signal *which* > message failed in a MULTIAPPEND set, actually Dave, I don't understand how is this different from MULTIAPPEND without IMAP Sieve: an IMAP Sieve script can't "fail" append. It can only discard message after it gets appended (see section 3.6). > - I did look, and Section 2.2.2's coverage of this particular problem > is, well, exceedingly economic. > > But this is a specific issue, rather than the more general problem. [...] > This ignores the interesting cases of whether an implementation > ignores, for the purposes of Sieve, events caused by Sieve scripts, > since otherwise two mailboxes could have conflicting scripts that > cheerfully bounced an APPENDed message backwards and forwards for all > eternity. Sieve fileinto caused by IMAP Sieve is not the same as IMAP COPY, but in order to avoid any doubts I agree that the Security Considerations should also mention that. > The Security Considerations section clearly states that > implementations might choose to do so, maybe, but only for flagchanges > on Tuesdays in Summer during non-leap years.
- WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-siev… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Ned Freed
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Dave Cridland
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Ned Freed
- Re: WGLC on IMAP Sieve (draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-… Alexey Melnikov