IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Naming conventions for Sieve RFCs

"Nigel Swinson" <Nigel.Swinson@mailsite.com> Mon, 13 August 2007 10:46 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l7DAkaF2079508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:46:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l7DAkacL079507; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:46:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.rockliffe.com (mail.rockliffe.com [147.208.128.10]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l7DAkZor079499 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:46:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Nigel.Swinson@mailsite.com)
X-Spam-Score-scoring_explanation:
X-Spam-Score-spf_status:
X-Spam-Score-Spamcatcher1: 096920b0290732a5bcdb98fcb2170588
X-Spam-Score-Summary: 50, 0, 0, 762ea742c844f198, c8077d8714ee5edb, nigel.swinson@mailsite.com, , RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:601:967:973:980:988:989:1155:1156:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1587:1593:1594:1683:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2393:2525:2559:2560:2561:2565:2570:2682:2685:2703:2857:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3027:3352:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:4250:5007:6261, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:none, DNSBL:none
X-Spam-Score-rbl_summary: none
X-Spam-Score-Phishing_status: no
X-Spam-Score-Countries:
X-Spam-Score-Charsets: windows-1252
X-Spam-Score: 5
Received: from nigelhome (unverified [10.42.40.207]) by mail.rockliffe.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 8.0.2) with ESMTP id <B0000438102@mail.rockliffe.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:46:34 -0700
Message-ID: <010b01c7dd97$37ab4580$d201a8c0@nigelhome>
From: Nigel Swinson <Nigel.Swinson@mailsite.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
References: <007f01c7db68$230c5140$d201a8c0@nigelhome> <46BEDD40.6020009@isode.com>
Subject: Re: Naming conventions for Sieve RFCs
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:46:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-variables
> >Sieve Extension: Variables
> >
> >
> Your proposal should work here.
>
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-notify-08
> >Sieve Extension: Notifications
> >
> >
> I can change the title, but I think that:
>  SIEVE Email Filtering Extension: Notifications
>
> is slightly more informative than:
>
>  SIEVE Email Filtering: Enotify Extension
>
> (who would know that enotify is about notifications?)
>
> Opinions?

I'd be happy with:

Sieve Email Filtering: Notifications

> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04
> >Sieve Extension: Relational Tests
> >
> >
> The same problem as above here: I think "Relational Tests" is more
> informative that "Relational Extension"

I'd be happy with:

Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Tests

I don't care if it's SIEVE or Sieve, either, but think it better to be
consistent, and it isn't consistent out there at the moment.

Nigel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email