IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sieve] Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism: SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 26 January 2012 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3794321F8615 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuZRikAzsogh for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B878621F8603 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0QMbV24023863; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1327617456; i=@resistor.net; bh=rm9mVYhEgDmKrnK5MuXtWcDJcMJQaHp2qeRpKXZ114c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=iaG83mHDYOZsTDTe6yD61u4iKpWtLT6cdcujhJItSWCV2Z2d6tupenA3KXFmEXWIg Wb2J+VxDiFdJxCm5Kn4sb+MOzgHgWp887quMsGvVM4YWx9l3FRIrM3F9VzksiTrQP3 wT26DmDlNUCqIFIbAw/htqG7nJf58sMcl6PZur48=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1327617456; i=@resistor.net; bh=rm9mVYhEgDmKrnK5MuXtWcDJcMJQaHp2qeRpKXZ114c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=rKnNqV3LeL8WnFsgPoZe7c9+e4z+90F6o9tEIEXtNHkcdqZez7lE/2aoFcDaa8rtz TImMvpXx1knfQ1xWkc5FXnjGJb/lKIRYD8BIfu9hZjtrq17OhByhV2VV4XUsxqSdrr ifxAhTWTpBGV0+G6KWPweJFS2sa52As2Z9QWh4ow=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120126142611.0a791a10@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:23 -0800
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <F08418C2DBAB49BD6C2C3E24@vp0101wa-dhcp96.apple.com>
References: <20120125201714.3903.82295.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F2075BE.5070201@nostrum.com> <033901ccdbab$6bae0900$430a1b00$@olddog.co.uk> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B226F573BC9@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4F208AEF.5060406@qualcomm.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B226F573BCE@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4F21ABF2.7040002@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120126115633.0cd39770@resistor.net> <F08418C2DBAB49BD6C2C3E24@vp0101wa-dhcp96.apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: sieve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sieve] Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism: SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:37:46 -0000

Hi Cyrus,
At 13:42 26-01-2012, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>There is feedback along those lines on the SIEVE WG mailing list. 
>Please see the thread started by Pete on this issue last year: 
><http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve/current/msg05178.html>. 
>That thread covers all the WG debate on this issue up until the two 
>recent last calls.

That's the "do nothing" alternative.  Peter mentioned that it is a bad idea.

At 13:44 26-01-2012, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>I was the chair present at that meeting. Apologies for not including 
>that detail in the minutes. All the meetings I chair include the 
>Note Well as the second slide in presentations I put together (which 
>seems to be common practice), and indeed you can see that in the 
>uploaded slides.

Thanks.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email