Re: [sieve] SPECIAL-USE in Sieve (RFC 6154)

NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com Sun, 03 April 2016 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1126212D608 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkoI7Clzw51t for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [68.183.62.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C828B12D605 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PYKK95XZQ800BKCP@mauve.mrochek.com> for sieve@ietf.org; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii; format=flowed
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PY1MT70XR400005M@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for sieve@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01PYKK8YKZBE00005M@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 09:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2016 13:27:55 +0200" <5700FE3B.1000302@rename-it.nl>
References: <56F9B3D8.8080104@rename-it.nl> <01PYIO7I2RPQ00005M@mauve.mrochek.com> <5700FE3B.1000302@rename-it.nl>
To: Stephan Bosch <stephan@rename-it.nl>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sieve/iHmEhRd9PzydDqX9p2PuH2f9uWQ>
Cc: Sieve mailing list <sieve@ietf.org>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Subject: Re: [sieve] SPECIAL-USE in Sieve (RFC 6154)
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sieve/>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:14:58 -0000


> Op 2-4-2016 om 9:28 schreef Ned Freed:
> >> Please tell me what you think. I aim to submit this to appsawg soon, but
> >> I think most Sieve people are still concentrated here, so I post it here
> >> first.
> > This looks like a useful addition to sieve to me. I support its adoption as a
> > draft.

> Thanks!

> > One thing you'll need to address is the ability for the same special use
> > attribute to be attached to multiple mailboxes. Since the ability to have the
> > same special-use attribute on multiple mailboxes is implementation-specific, my
> > suggestion would be to make the behavior in this case implementation-specific
> > as well.

> Section 4 states the following:

> "More than one mailbox can have a particular special-use flag assigned.
> In that case, the mailbox that is chosen for delivery is
> implementation-defined. However, implementations MUST ensure that this
> choice is made consistently, so that the same mailbox is used every time."

Missed that, sorry.

> Isn't that what you mean? What is missing?

Yes, that addresses the issue.

				Ned