Re: [sieve] New Version Notification for draft-george-sieve-notify-presence-00

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 09 February 2010 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B543A738F for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kZRrPKvl6RSx for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DC23A7331 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.124] ((unknown) [62.3.217.253]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S3FuDgBCzj5-@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:15:50 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4B713C32.6030607@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:42:58 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: barryleiba@computer.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <20100131234349.4D8B33A68C4@core3.amsl.com> <9abf48a61001311550t4a61ce38heafb66d912ca4ace@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a1002041104n1c1e41b3mcdf4b466dbf53c4d@mail.gmail.com> <01NJDK8BQYLI0002QL@mauve.mrochek.com> <6c9fcc2a1002081017j2c82fcfbv16e09af47a6ffe17@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a1002081017j2c82fcfbv16e09af47a6ffe17@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sieve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sieve] New Version Notification for draft-george-sieve-notify-presence-00
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:14:46 -0000

Barry Leiba wrote:
 [...]

>>But maybe I'm worrying about nothing. AFAIK all of the currently defined
>>presence checks have an associated notification mechanism.  And even if such a
>>mechanism exists, there's nothing to say an implementation couldn't implement
>>only the presence check part of enotify.
>>    
>>
Exactly.
One use case I have in mind is IMAP presence (== "is this user currently 
connected to the IMAP server"). So I am planning to implement "IMAP 
presence check", but there would be no "IMAP notification" - it is 
already covered by IMAP IDLE.

>Right... supporting enotify doesn't do anything _per se_, unless
>specific notification methods are also supported.  So it seems a "mix
>and match" kind of thing.
>  
>