Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 20 June 2011 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D381421F8462 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iG1RMLCkc2QE for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E135121F845E for <sieve@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so3280734gxk.31 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vOMVrP6JMMuG6XE/NVXijcRIKOz8N+4UtqFdLvyfVaw=; b=xLkplu2O9Fh37CV+QSW4TMlvH3yc/18o9girff899uUqraSlFGRWCYkfngvEwaRFKe nvVVJjfpaUaxTMvBV2NZJJQ/ykihhFQo7aut3QDbnAgF+uXTIWkiIzBBAByt8j8EnPHm +m4XHG9vQ99JKQ3uRt5LFoIOcRgsUynVdHK8E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=KgewPPBwECdm+abTbO2IuWFUGv/5x4AOw6CXSPoK4mo7Smtv4/T3yJQqrSASXUIEaf sugH8E88yydVQd0uNOfIiLrpZZQ2HjQ4BSHDIvjgwImJu40M+TOOkTZksGhHFYCnkkBp yro9lATo8279uhPxFaHvMJ09vFIj5bigHotIs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.168.99 with SMTP id j63mr7869089yhl.117.1308592824270; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.99.3 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikVWTm3m+UgWJ1ULeUQAJo-dA=g-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <816FC375A4D2F1E3CCDEEAA2@caldav.corp.apple.com> <BANLkTikVWTm3m+UgWJ1ULeUQAJo-dA=g-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:00:24 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aAbIKmpyRECICcU5A0yN4XfmfbU
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=u4-mtQsmpWpfD0b4xvyjbM4jZDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: SIEVE <sieve@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:00:30 -0000

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> Hi, Cyrus, and thanks for the update.
>
>> draft-ietf-sieve-autoreply
>> draft-ietf-sieve-external-lists
>> draft-ietf-sieve-notify-presence
>> draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-seconds
>>
>> These should all be published soon (having mostly been blocked on
>> external-lists which was recently approved). Thanks to everyone for their
>> work on these.
>
> We can actually ask the ADs to release the hold on the three earlier
> drafts.  They were not actually waiting on a normative reference to
> external-lists.  It was an AD-requested hold to make sure that the
> external-lists URI questions were settled down so that the examples
> would be correct.  Now that external-lists is in the RFC-ed queue, the
> other three docs can go ahead.  I'm copying Pete, asking him to ask
> the RFC Editor to go ahead and process autoreply, notify-presence, and
> vacation-seconds, and I will correct the examples in AUTH48.

But, of course, I forgot to copy Pete.  Doing that this time.

Barry