Re: [Sigtran] ISDN BA layer 1 activation

Ken Morneault <kmorneau@cisco.com> Fri, 19 March 2004 14:53 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA05787 for <sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:53:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4LMr-0006C5-FQ for sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:53:01 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JEr1kR023786 for sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:53:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4LMq-0006BT-NK; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:53:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4LM9-000696-Ct for sigtran@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:52:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA05657 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:52:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4LM7-0006qQ-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:52:15 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4LLD-0006l7-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:51:22 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4LK7-0006di-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:50:11 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2004 06:48:34 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from fruitpie.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@fruitpie.cisco.com [64.102.16.27]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i2JEnbUm029438; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:49:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kmorneau-w2k01.cisco.com (rtp-vpn2-179.cisco.com [10.82.240.179]) by fruitpie.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AXV65206; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040319094902.02eabde0@cia.cisco.com>
X-Sender: kmorneau@cia.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:49:34 -0500
To: "Miesch, Thomas" <Thomas.Miesch@keymile.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
From: Ken Morneault <kmorneau@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] ISDN BA layer 1 activation
In-Reply-To: <0844651B8D1CF342AC6903B7FF9982CF21841C@srvchber1200.dt.net >
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>


Thomas,

The MG is responsible for Layer 1
activation.  It is out of scope for
IUA.

Regards,

Ken


At 03:39 PM 3/19/2004 +0100, Miesch, Thomas wrote:

> 
>
>Hello 
>
>After reading of the megaco standards and the IUA RFC.
>
>The question remains how the ISDN BA layer 1 activation is done.
>
>I didn't find any informations about it.
>
> 
>
>As I understand there was a proposed IL1A draft (draft-bouwen-sigtran-il1a-01.txt) by Mr. Bouwen and Mr. Morneault.
>
>But this paper has expired and is no longer valid.
>
>Somewhere I read that that paper is not in the focus of the Sigtran working group
>
>and will be handled only as an extension for the IUA standard.
>
>But in the new draft of the IUA standard (draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3057bis-00.txt)
>
>I didn't saw any information about that issue.
>
> 
>
>So the questions stay:
>
>How should the layer1 activation be handled?
>
>Who is responsible for the activation of the ISDN BA Layer 1, the MGC or the MG?
>
>If the responsibility is by the MGC, how the Layer 1 activation is done?
>
>In which document the activation sequence is described?
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Best Regards
>
>Thomas Miesch
>
> 


_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
Sigtran@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran