IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sigtran] Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node

gitam changkakoti <gitam.changkakoti@live.in> Mon, 25 July 2016 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <gitam.changkakoti@live.in>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4010B12D1DD for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QD8ktg5kX5eV for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT004-OMC2S40.hotmail.com (snt004-omc2s40.hotmail.com [65.54.61.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ECB512D1D7 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.73]) by SNT004-OMC2S40.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:58:07 -0700
Received: from HK2APC01FT017.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.56) by HK2APC01HT146.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.539.16; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:57:56 +0000
Received: from SG2PR0301MB2127.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.59) by HK2APC01FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.184) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:57:56 +0000
Received: from SG2PR0301MB2127.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.80.149]) by SG2PR0301MB2127.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.80.149]) with mapi id 15.01.0544.019; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:57:55 +0000
From: gitam changkakoti <gitam.changkakoti@live.in>
To: "sigtran@ietf.org" <sigtran@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node
Thread-Index: AQHR5lkuswNAJb2G+ke8mLGKVuGbs6ApXqqg
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:57:54 +0000
Message-ID: <SG2PR0301MB2127866D25F2B3D92AA1CF35ED0D0@SG2PR0301MB2127.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <PS1PR0301MB212239D13AA549F53900907BED0D0@PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PS1PR0301MB212239D13AA549F53900907BED0D0@PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.248.59) smtp.mailfrom=live.in; ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=live.in;
received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning live.in discourages use of 10.152.248.59 as permitted sender)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [BHVRvEfnCwm81+1WXan/DklWEPBpLk1p]
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.248.59; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT146; H:SG2PR0301MB2127.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT146; 6:0KoMn8tcE9RVIqlLoaI4lhIBDu3u7PYqnN+tAqyLQlCLnbHnWFkuV18hG7N1DZ8YUilbwBGRIVAs9xb06hRqjqXQComK/MUyvQe041ix4f42CUNgy76cdEfGir8FxnYySzRkQgxyuWvocF2IFHsHtB9AvZfZ9eTx+QlhZuDu24Xr8RS0BECARHc4i737TGaQNtyM4ZCgAitTn2FwJH+CnAL65k/EjfFb6yPQAS/hnVCTrtVP4k/nwXE37fg29nX2VSiiMvmLkNXrW/xfwsVK5qveJtINZ5RRaqP86fmrk2QXAz8iNyfcdrmEawVeFfNR; 5:OUk4cUAYLhFwB1YT3BpYN/h2Smzgp6TBysXX7vTe17XySFeBmdvpQlS4TCtfnnRX0EZZpSa64kAAIJS63g4OHDbgOZPywmm0x0C5MNrlXArNpl7Aflq4lSAbWElCgynS4GvP9mp6Njir7YTrh0guIg==; 24:RI1NVDW9QE9teiU6++N6TWYWj1HmF/NTo5jqb2q0UoStxxzyvvzETtUWqOXHh+wMk4jSmmFMQTQdWmA0dHb0Fv7a00uJv3kh6Q2FWE8nt/s=; 7:2WfMs0XU152aTe8lCqHICHjdnHmneaqHJBcfqi0pB+57UbmDF+X7raJuJvb/V9Xg8JLb/qwdtxf44BVv8+1xoo+rGV8riOFGNJvWhgCfHkoFr7XGn2g5hWG+zZMPAa6UARFzcUhE2skOqkjoGR9n735B+Avq/BAQw5+nfhMtkaV3+T0u3qT+ztYYnKHfK0vqsOQmcj3dY7TZAdyVV7c/2UDMS+ZNum/NsrrNFXQc69TTbZOgcxdaUee6ismShs4P
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e3245908-4d69-479f-c909-08d3b4acd29e
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047); SRVR:HK2APC01HT146;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:HK2APC01HT146; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HK2APC01HT146;
x-forefront-prvs: 0014E2CF50
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jul 2016 16:57:54.6564 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT146
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2016 16:58:07.0983 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7DF37F0:01D1E695]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/h3XaWBxKiutLbghLy3pS_sgkceo>
Subject: [Sigtran] Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:58:09 -0000

> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Greetings .... This mail is intended to seek suggestion on Sigtran connectivity between multivendor node.
> 
> We are trying to connect open MGW to an AOIP BSC. Both belongs to different vendors. Fluctuation of M3Ua SUA observed at BSC end post   Connectivity. 
> 
> As per MGW vendor BSC is not supposed to send SUA management messages to MGW( DAUD) which is causing MGW to send DUNA to BSC inturn causing fluctuations @ BSc end for mgw cluster SPC.
> 
> Please be informed, there is no fluctuation @ association level. Kindly suggest and share the actual guidelines . What should happen as per Rfc.
> 
> Regards
> Gitam
> +919706818836
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email