[Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Association
aditi someshwar <aditi.someshwar@gmail.com> Mon, 20 June 2011 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <aditi.someshwar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6626B11E80BA for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQYf7huxH732 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FADE11E80AC for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so1350322eye.31 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aiKejXM9KkP8S08qT6/l/sUi5kowgsWnYBbgvvju66M=; b=dAZrJpD2PvNCpw5OhClNjHvEBfMStcr6y2XBp85DngMkXWLP8uVBPmh3jSEfat6M2q iwfWadpfmVg/huFsQckitLGGlK7ZjNBIXvatWgT5s1rT0edHT5krvdqp6mdeMM4lppUb TfAK+XTJ4wHIevWES+rR09dnqidfkr45LnmNg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bM60t5Rg69ZrmHpViVO5bABjwhlS1C5PmfBnwAL0J3HmKT9MkT1PznSXjcgnPXHq1u e2AJaOcmCCMLUh5EZTUC63UkcrbqA3NLf6N7HKEqrLgnYXOmsVEAPfQsmiAb7wdAYO6b Qx9ChLbD/DJa8+c2pC4uzPuP1CBlZdBR+TdMo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.8.69 with SMTP id 45mr1967878eeq.130.1308576652577; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.47.138 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:00:52 +0530
Message-ID: <BANLkTin9_O3B=nAsjXc1zxNtt3Z48kQThA@mail.gmail.com>
From: aditi someshwar <aditi.someshwar@gmail.com>
To: sigtran@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d46b8f89ca7604a624be26"
Subject: [Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Association
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:48:16 -0000
Dear all, Need one clarification please: NUMBER OF STREAMS WITHIN AN SCTP ASSOCIATION - In quite a few RFCs, it is mentioned that the NUMBER OF STREAMS within one SCTP Association can be USER DEFINED, & that the two end-nodes NEGOTIATE these at the time "Association Set Up". However, REPEATEDLY, these RFCs also suggest that STREAM 0 shall be used for interchange of CONTROL MESSAGES while STREAM 1 (Note: They call it STREAM-1, & NOT "other than Stream 0") carries Data. It is NOT very clear if the RFCs THEMSELVES are specifying / suggesting that AT MAX, there should be ONLY TWO STREAMs OR is it more a DEFAULT by most PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS who have (to keep matters less complex) decided to IMPLEMENT only TWO STREAMS. Thanks and Regards, Aditi
- [Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Association aditi someshwar
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Associati… Chris Benson
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Associati… aditi someshwar
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of streams in SCTP Associati… Brian F. G. Bidulock