Re: [Simple] Presence dictionary. Reviewers needed

[Matthias Granberry <[e-mail]>]

There are mismatches between Appendix A and figure 3.  The 3- 
character strings haven't been removed from the appendix.

On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Miguel Garcia wrote:

> Hi:
>
> A new version of the presence dictionary is available:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-garcia-simple-presence- 
> dictionary-03.txt
>
> This version has removed those strings that are 3 characters or  
> less, as per Adam's suggestion.
>
> At this time, I am soliciting for reviewers of the document. During  
> the meeting in Prague we got a few volunteers. I remember Adam  
> Roach, Krisztian Kiss, and Andrew Allen volunteered, but there were  
> more volunteers, although I didn't get their names. Please send me  
> a note if you want to review the document.
>
> A few guidelines for the reviewers:
>
> You should focus on two aspects in the draft:
>
> 1) Are all the the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that we can see in  
> presence XML documents included in the dictionary or is there any  
> missing extension?
>
> 2) Is the priority value for each string correct?
>
> Please send your comments to the list and copy myself too.
>
> /Miguel
>
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple