[Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4479 (2963)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 08 September 2011 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD93E21F8B70 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nwgwj0Cim7QG for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B90321F8B6E for <simple@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B0FB398C261; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: jdrosen@cisco.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, ben@nostrum.com, hisham.khartabil@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110908073039.B0FB398C261@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:30:39 -0700
Cc: raphael.bossek@googlemail.com, simple@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4479 (2963)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:28:48 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4479, "A Data Model for Presence". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4479&eid=2963 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Raphael Bossek <raphael.bossek@googlemail.com> Section: 7.1. Original Text ------------- <dm:deviceID>mac:8asd7d7d70</dm:deviceID> ... <dm:deviceID>mac:8asd7d7d70</dm:deviceID> Corrected Text -------------- Replace both with <dm:deviceID>urn:uuid:698137d0-b395-11e0-aff2-0800200c9a66</dm:deviceID> Notes ----- As mentioned in Errata ID 2131 and 2962 a valid URN as defined in RFC3406: Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms should be used for <dm:deviceID>. This is not the case for this example. RFC 4479 in section 3.4. Device RECOMMENDS version 1 UUIDs for the <deviceID> element: "For devices with a MAC address, version 1 UUIDs are RECOMMENDED, as they result in a time-based identifier that makes use of the MAC address." Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4479 (draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-07) -------------------------------------- Title : A Data Model for Presence Publication Date : July 2006 Author(s) : J. Rosenberg Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4479 (296… RFC Errata System