Re: [Simple] The fate of PIDFConn

The new "range" attribute, which was considered bad, got basically all 
the attention in today's session.  Anyway, that was only a small 
addition to the draft. Generally, expressing connectivity features in 
PIDF has got only positive feedback earlier. So, it would be a pity to 
disband this work completely and be satisfied with only the current 
"priority" attribute in PIDF for expressing the features of 
communication addresses. Mapping more than one features of a 
communication address (connectivity) to a single "priority" decimal 
number is impossible.

-Erkki

Hisham Khartabil wrote:
> During the SIMPLE WG meeting, the PIDFConn updated internet draft 
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ala-kurikka-simple-pidfconn-01.txt) 
> was presented. A poll was taken in the WG meeting asking the question 
> of whether the WG would like to take this draft on as a WG item. There 
> was an overwhelming majority that voted for *not* taking on this work 
> in the SIMPLE WG.
>
> If there are folks that were not present at the WG meeting that would 
> like to voice their opinion to the contrary of what was agreed, please 
> speak now.
>
> Regards,
> Hisham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

-- 
___________________________________________________________________
Erkki Harjula, Researcher
MediaTeam Oulu Group, University of Oulu
Erkki Koiso-Kanttilan katu 3, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
e-mail: erkki.harjula@ee.oulu.fi, http://www.mediateam.oulu.fi
tel. +358-8-5532543, mob. +358-50-3030478, fax. +358-8-5532534
___________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple