Re: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 (3013)
Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com> Mon, 07 November 2011 03:57 UTC
Return-Path: <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5FA1F0C35 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:57:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBIjS-UFERdd for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B151F0C34 for <simple@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkbzv15 with SMTP id zv15so3700286bkb.31 for <simple@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:57:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oXHBOY1ezeNYaq6mFkB0E5coVwhxcrjL3DFraShHwGw=; b=GHoKT8pjfAv0xSLXhi2k8xZyUdIbnhj3xezO6RkyE1lO1bvpAr+1PQG6NkikUKrmGj qSd9ojuYrxedt/RkAyVUsJeQh5eisg2cgHwRG+bO8+HzRAqB0EVBswInZcFP4q+KYsBS /+qmRzK6ExuOezixXwKCFoJ2vnEiXUU2+1Zp8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.9.1 with SMTP id j1mr17928871bkj.57.1320638245338; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.54.19 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:57:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AEA158B0C52AEC4394D7B68A331367F46C859D4D90@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <20111104140953.C00066219F@rfc-editor.org> <AEA158B0C52AEC4394D7B68A331367F46C859D4D90@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:57:25 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO3SuiKMJDmv=Rt-uUxfuG19hHuLdTpaaPBJtM4bfQug9omsOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com>
To: Nancy Greene <nancy.greene@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00151758f34c7d7e6b04b11d0d4c"
Cc: "dan.price@infinite.com" <dan.price@infinite.com>, "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 (3013)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:57:27 -0000
Hi, I see separators in the examples in RFC3862, but I fail to find the text that mandates that or describes it. Can you point it out to me? Thanks, Hisham On 5 November 2011 01:48, Nancy Greene <nancy.greene@ericsson.com> wrote: > This is the same issue I raised on the sip-implementor's list. Good to see > this errata finally posted! > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2011-September/027736.html > > Nancy > > > www.ericsson.com - This Communication is Confidential. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the term set out at > www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer > > -----Original Message----- > From: simple-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:simple-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of RFC Errata System > Sent: November-04-11 10:10 AM > To: eburger@standardstrack.com; hisham.khartabil@gmail.com; Gonzalo > Camarillo; rjsparks@nostrum.com; ben@nostrum.com; > hisham.khartabil@gmail.com > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; simple@ietf.org; dan.price@infinite.com > Subject: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 (3013) > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5438, "Instant > Message Disposition Notification (IMDN)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5438&eid=3013 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Dan Price <dan.price@infinite.com> > > Section: 7.2.1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > From: Bob <im:bob@example.com> > To: Alice <im:alice@example.com> > NS: imdn <urn:ietf:params:imdn> > imdn.Message-ID: d834jied93rf > Content-type: message/imdn+xml > Content-Disposition: notification > Content-length: ... > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > From: Bob <im:bob@example.com> > To: Alice <im:alice@example.com> > NS: imdn <urn:ietf:params:imdn> > imdn.Message-ID: d834jied93rf > > Content-type: message/imdn+xml > Content-Disposition: notification > Content-length: ... > > > Notes > ----- > None of the examples in this RFC comply with the format of CPIM defined in > RFC 3862, in which the message metadata headers are separated from the > headers of the encapsulated MIME object by a blank line. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a > decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the > status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5438 (draft-ietf-simple-imdn-10) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Instant Message Disposition Notification (IMDN) > Publication Date : February 2009 > Author(s) : E. Burger, H. Khartabil > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging > Extensions > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > Simple mailing list > Simple@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple >
- [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 (301… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 … Nancy Greene
- Re: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 … Hisham Khartabil
- Re: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5438 … Robert Sparks