IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status [Future]

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Sat, 15 May 2004 21:55 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA13000 for <simple-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BP77t-0003ka-QA for simple-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:55:25 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BP770-0003LR-00 for simple-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:54:31 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BP76a-0002wt-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:54:04 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BP72h-0006WW-2b; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:50:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BP716-0006O6-KZ for simple@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:48:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12751 for <simple@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:48:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BP714-0000sH-1U for simple@ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:48:22 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BP708-0000T3-00 for simple@ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:47:25 -0400
Received: from opus.cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.20.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BP6zh-00004W-00 for simple@ietf.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:46:57 -0400
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (chairpc.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by opus.cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4FLktbt028252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 15 May 2004 17:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <40A68FCF.3030705@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com
CC: simple@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status [Future]
References: <0C1353ABB1DEB74DB067ADFF749C4EEF01D1731D@esebe004.ntc.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C1353ABB1DEB74DB067ADFF749C4EEF01D1731D@esebe004.ntc.nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 4.6.0.97784, Antispam-Core: 4.6.0.97340, Antispam-Data: 2004.5.14.100877
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __REFERENCES 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, USER_AGENT 0.000'
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: simple-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: simple-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/simple/>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 17:46:55 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here are my comments to draft-ietf-simple-future-01. Sorry if I have
> duplicated issues which have already been discussed. Other than these I
> think draft is ready to go.
> 
> Page 1:
> IPR statement section contains wrong RFC reference. 
> in accordance with RFC 3667 -> in accordance with RFC 3668

xml2rfc bug; fixed by new version.

> 
> Section 2, second parachaph:
> time until which is element is expected to be valid ->
> time until which this element is expected to be valid

Fixed.

> 
> Section 5.1,
> Line 
> <title>Timed-Status Information in Presence Information Data
> Format</title>
> Seems to exceed maximum allowed number of characters.

Adjusted to current title.

> 
> References:
> Can PIDF (draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-08) be informative reference if
> timed-status XML schemas uses elements defined in PIDF? I think it
> should be normative.

Indeed.

> 
> - Mikko


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email