[Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4975 (1954)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 03 December 2009 11:50 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: simple@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A05D3A68ED for <simple@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:50:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiGFrgL+qpmc for <simple@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCF03A6828 for <simple@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB3BnCZs022364; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id nB3BnCk4022362; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:49:12 -0800
Message-Id: <200912031149.nB3BnCk4022362@boreas.isi.edu>
To: ben@estacado.net, rohan@ekabal.com, fluffy@cisco.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, fluffy@cisco.com, ben@nostrum.com, hisham.khartabil@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:45:44 -0800
Cc: dennis.noordsij@movial.com, simple@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4975 (1954)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:50:38 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4975, "The Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4975&eid=1954 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Dennis Noordsij <dennis.noordsij@movial.com> Section: 9 Original Text ------------- ext-header = hname ":" SP hval CRLF Corrected Text -------------- ext-header = hname ":" SP hval Notes ----- The rule: headers = To-Path CRLF From-Path CRLF 1*( header CRLF ) already suffixes every header with a CRLF. The result is that the extension headers are followed by 2 CRLFs, introducing empty lines inside the header segment. This appears to be unintended, since none of the other headers have a terminating CRLF in their production rules, only the ext-header. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4975 (draft-ietf-simple-message-sessions-19) -------------------------------------- Title : The Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) Publication Date : September 2007 Author(s) : B. Campbell, Ed., R. Mahy, Ed., C. Jennings, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4975 (195… RFC Errata System