[PWE3] IANA Consideration in draft-metz-aii-aggregate-00

Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com> Wed, 03 August 2005 10:17 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E0GJF-0002eI-Pz; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:17:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E0GJB-0002bl-DC for pwe3@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:17:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA02081 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tlv1.axerra.com ([80.74.100.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0Gpq-0008FN-Py for pwe3@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:50:55 -0400
Received: by TLV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <P6WC5CGM>; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:17:17 +0300
Message-ID: <AF5018AC03D1D411ABB70002A5091326025B6324@TLV1>
From: Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com>
To: "'chmetz@cisco.com'" <chmetz@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:17:16 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: "'pwe3@ietf.org'" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: [PWE3] IANA Consideration in draft-metz-aii-aggregate-00
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org

Chris and all,
Sorry for misplacing my comment at the PWE3 session today.

Howeve, the substance is still there: the IANA Considerations section'of the
draft in question requests 3 new AII types but only lists 2.

I understand now (from a side discussion) that the original intent was 
to use one more AII type for the PWid/FEC 128 and I think that
it is worth keeping this AII type separate.

Regards,
                       Sasha

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3