Re: [sip-clf] Implementation - Code and Results

Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu> Wed, 27 October 2010 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA863A6955 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.889, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcJ5kw9USDA7 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DFF3A680C for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194792C0001B6; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office.hd)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TD5yZlWnn0ol; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (Methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9562C0001B2; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.152]) by METHONE.office.hd ([192.168.24.54]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:35:16 +0200
From: Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>, "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sip-clf] Implementation - Code and Results
Thread-Index: AQHLdP1VzFiNWcF9iUi0Prc2QOQC1pNUvDgAgAAygAA=
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:35:15 +0000
Message-ID: <752EDF9B02C09847950620E262C45431841220@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <AANLkTimO0vUhjRJBU9iSkLXkQ3xT36up635y+4__QoO1@mail.gmail.com> <4CC83820.2090103@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC83820.2090103@bell-labs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.2.193]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016F_01CB75FD.50A30DF0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Implementation - Code and Results
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:33:52 -0000

Vijay,

> Small devices (mobile phones running SIP) will not generate that much
> traffic per day --- when compared to a SIP proxy --- to make the space
> issue a deterrent.

are we looking at log generated by small devices? there is not
so much you can analyze from them (unless you merge them, which 
is outside the scope of the charter now), the interesting part 
is to look at the SIP proxy logs...

Cheers,
Saverio

============================================================
Dr. Saverio Niccolini
Manager, Real-Time Communications Group
NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division     
Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-118
NEC*NET Phone: 800-49-33-118
Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
e-mail:  saverio.niccolini@neclab.eu
============================================================
NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria
Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014

  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Vijay K. Gurbani
> Sent: 27 October 2010 16:33
> To: sip-clf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Implementation - Code and Results
> 
> On 10/26/2010 06:02 AM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
> > HI all,
> >
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sipclf/trac/wiki/WikiStart
> >
> > contains some sample output files and the core Java code I used to
> > generate each log format.
> 
> Peter: Very interesting.  Thanks for embarking on this exercise.
> One comment inline.
> 
> > My general feelings:
> > - indexed ASCII files are bigger (by about 1.5 x) but that's not a
> very
> > big factor when bytes on disk are so cheap (people coding on small
> > devices may feel differently)
> 
> Small devices (mobile phones running SIP) will not generate that much
> traffic per day --- when compared to a SIP proxy --- to make the space
> issue a deterrent.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf