[sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-10: changes requested from IESG review

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 06 February 2012 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAD821F86E8 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:45:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.797, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uCyqH-jujWiS for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:45:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0752F21F86EC for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q16HjiXl025490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:45:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q16HjhoP009142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:45:44 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q16Hjhau006704 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:45:43 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4F3012C6.9030904@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:49:58 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Subject: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-10: changes requested from IESG review
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:45:47 -0000

All: During the IESG review of draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement,
there was considerable feedback on why the draft was designated as
"Informational".  The IESG felt that the draft went beyond
being "Informational" since it actually defines both a problem
statement (Section 3) and the data model (Section 8).  Furthermore,
the data model defined in this document was to be actually implemented
by one or more representation drafts, and as such, they felt that
making this document a standards-track was warranted.

Clearly, as the work moved ahead, the problem-statement draft morphed
from being only a problem statement to containing more concrete issues
pertaining to the data model that the representation formats would
adhere to.  In that respect, I think the IESG is accurate.

Therefore, the designation of the draft has been changed to reflect
this; the new designation is that of a standards-track document.

There were other modifications as well:
  - New paragraph added at the end of Section 2 to make the intent
    of this document clear, i.e., it serves as a problem statement
    and also contains a data model.
  - Section 5.2 adds some new text in relation to Wireshark.
  - Section 10 (Security Considerations) has been expanded
    in minor ways to address additional issues related to the
    privacy of logs at rest and logs in motion.
  - Normative language added to the considerations in Section 10.
  - Minor word changes as requested during IESG review and fixing
    typos.

Version -10 is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-10
and a diff from -09 is at
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-10.txt

Please review the changes so we can move the work ahead.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/