[sip-clf] sipclf-problem-statement-11

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Fri, 09 March 2012 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADD821E8097 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:08:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.670, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QJtWFe1ZWAhL for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ED221E8098 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q29K8QPv024995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q29K8Qax026120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q29K8QXA001204 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4F5A644E.5060405@bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:13:02 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Subject: [sip-clf] sipclf-problem-statement-11
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:08:28 -0000

All: I have updated sipclf-problem-statement to version 11.  The draft
is available in the archives at [1] and diffs from -10 are at [2].

The major change is an update to S5 (Alternative approaches to
SIP CLF) to reflect the syslog and ipfix discussion we had in the WG
ML.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

[1] 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11.txt
[2] 
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11

Thank you,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/