Re: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-00 submitted

["Rainer Gerhards" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Vijay,

iff you take the path of describing the information model, only, I would
suggest that your remove all wording that talks about protocols, transmission
of messages etc. Also, in that case, I'd recommend to  state clearly that it
is "just" an information model and not an on-wire/on-disk format and that
other documents are needed to specify these layers.

My 2cts...

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf Of Vijay K. Gurbani
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 5:00 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-00 submitted
> 
> Folks:
> 
> I have submitted draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-00.
> Nothing in this draft has changed from
> draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01 except the draft
> name to reflect WG adoption.  I will revise it shortly
> to reflect the discussion we have been having on the mailing
> list.
> 
> The URL to the WG version -00 is:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-00.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf