Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward
"Saverio Niccolini" <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu> Mon, 07 June 2010 14:51 UTC
Return-Path: <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310A13A6837 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zHq9nAt9s0Y for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636F03A6D61 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C352C000C16; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:11:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlJDNZzjXFCW; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:11:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71052C000C12; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:11:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:10:56 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB04F6.DA284810"
Message-ID: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C014B9732@VENUS.office>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikIozkrkxV9yhazeFqVj-EUPrjJczryUXUmh1I8@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward
Thread-Index: Acr/R+DxQTzaXfQ1RuKO6qNl7C3cKwFnbIHQ
References: <AANLkTikIozkrkxV9yhazeFqVj-EUPrjJczryUXUmh1I8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@neclab.eu>
To: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>, sip-clf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:51:10 -0000
Dear Peter, > Also, Rob Sparks had requested concrete examples of logs using the SIP > torture tests as a source. Volunteers? Well, we actually did that... Please have a look at: Section 5.1. A tool producing an IPFIX file format for SIPCLF of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-02 where we took examples from the Section 3.1 of [RFC3665] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3665#section-3.1 we used RFC 3665 instead of the torture tests since we felt the torture tests are actually meant for a different scope, we needed basic call flow examples and RFC 3665 was more suited for that... Cheers, Saverio ============================================================ Dr. Saverio Niccolini Manager, Real-Time Communications Group NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49 (0)6221 4342-118 Fax: +49 (0)6221 4342-155 e-mail: saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu ============================================================ NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Musgrave > Sent: 29 May 2010 17:59 > To: sip-clf@ietf.org > Subject: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward > > Hi all, > > First, thanks to Spencer for his work with this group. He has stepped > down as the co-chair since he is now active in the IAB. > > I will be joining Theo as the new co-chair of this group. > > I have been reading past threads and current docs (I will post > as-individual comments in the next few days). There has been a lot of > good discussion > > It seems that after a flurry of activity leading up to Anaheim - we > have hit the "post meeting let-down". > > It seems to me that: > 1) We need to continue with the problem statement [especially closing > on the "what" or "semantics" to be logged] > 2) Discussion on IPFIX needs to continue. > 3) We need an individual draft to start the discussion on the non-IPFIX > option. [Volunteers?] > > and that these should be the basis for a discussion at IETF78. > > Will we have quorum and people who can discuss these items in > Maastricht? Please let me know ASAP and I will request a meeting slot. > > The minutes of IETF77 showed: > "Chair: Please hum for one format only or for two options? Strong > consensus in the room for working on both options." > > So item (3) above is a desire to get this "other option" out in the > world so we can discuss it in parallel with IPFIX. > > Also, Rob Sparks had requested concrete examples of logs using the SIP > torture tests as a source. Volunteers? > > This WG was perhaps a bit optimistic in the initial milestones (which > currently call for problem statement to IESG in Jan 2010 and spec. > WGLC in Mar 2010.) > > Can I get an indication from people who are willing to do work on what > they think is realistic for new milestones? Can we get everything in > play for a substantial discussion at IETF78? > > > Regards, > > Peter Musgrave > _______________________________________________ > sip-clf mailing list > sip-clf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
- [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward Peter Musgrave
- Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward Benoit Claise
- Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward Saverio Niccolini
- Re: [sip-clf] New co-chair/IETF78/Moving Forward Peter Musgrave