[sip-clf] Conflict for next time....

Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500CF3A67E4 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mi4mbuxpbOQv for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6973A679F for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gwb10 with SMTP id 10so1289269gwb.31 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.11.7 with SMTP id 7mr2764475ybk.411.1289519786384; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-408b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-408b.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.64.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g3sm1903888yha.2.2010.11.11.15.56.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:56:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:56:21 +0800
Message-Id: <5DA66F6E-16D6-4DBF-9F43-6FB929F71290@magorcorp.com>
To: "sip-clf@ietf.org Mailing" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [sip-clf] Conflict for next time....
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:55:56 -0000

All, 

Since it is now fresh in our mind, can I get people to suggest a conflict list they would like to see used when scheduling the next session in Prague?

Are there any RAI groups we don't object to a conflict with?

Are there specific groups in other areas we want to list? e.g. opsarea came up this time...ipfix is another one.

I realize we are a diverse group, however, in the interests of not over-straining the issue, the conflicts of those people most active in the group will be given more weight. 

If you have a conflict you want me to consider next time please indicate if it is because:
- you chair the other group
- you are a contributor (doc author or significant reviewer) for the group
- you wish to follow the other group

No schedule will make everyone happy - but the better info I have the more likely we can avoid churn...

Thanks,

Peter Musgrave
Co-Chair