[sip-clf] draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-04

[Peter Musgrave <[e-mail]>]

Hi IPFIXers,

(as individual)

I have started on implementing both formats so I can make a relative
comparison.

Some questions about the IPFIX draft:

In Figure 2 and 3 the base request and response templates are listed.
Can the order in the response template be altered so protocol
identifier precedes SIpResponseStatus? This makes the two templates
common up to this point (and saves an IF stmt in the implementation)?

In the example of templates in Figure 6 the template comment and log
data show 16 data elements. I only count 15 in the template in Figure
2 and 3. It seems that sipServerTransaction is provided in the example
but not
listed in Fig 2 and 3.

In the example in figure at 0040: 81 92 should (I think) be followed
by an entry for 81 a3 (to correspond to 419 sipObservation type) and
then 81 93 etc.


Regards,

Peter Musgrave