IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-clf] Last call of problem-statement

Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com> Wed, 10 November 2010 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A093A67E1 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sY35-pSqgbTx for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46A93A6783 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so484015gyh.31 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.47.6 with SMTP id u6mr3396249anu.228.1289428775024; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-408b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-408b.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.64.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm1382209anq.10.2010.11.10.14.39.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CDAEF3D.1010809@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:39:29 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <674C63F5-64AC-4AAB-B60A-D18F5913FC26@magorcorp.com>
References: <4CDAEF3D.1010809@bell-labs.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Last call of problem-statement
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:39:34 -0000

Hi Vijay, 

IIRC I think I intended we should do an -05 and then I think we're ready for WGLC. 

I will prepare some notes on my understanding about the changes for the problem statement. 

Peter

On 2010-11-11, at 3:15 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:

> Hi: Going through the notes from the Beijing sipclf meeting
> but without the benefit of audio (streaming or stored), I note
> that there was a chair suggestion to WGLC problem-statement
> draft, but this suggestion was tabled.
> 
> May I ask why?  It would be good to get the problem-statement
> done.  Is there a specific reason or reasons why it was decided
> not to progress it?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> -- 
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email