Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-sec-agree-02.txt
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 04 June 2002 14:31 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA00510 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id KAA02113 for sip-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA01184; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA01154 for <sip@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:21:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from p2.piuha.net (p2.piuha.net [131.160.192.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA29948 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:20:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by p2.piuha.net (Postfix, from userid 962) id 12F326A906; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:21:09 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from piuha.net (p4.piuha.net [131.160.192.4]) by p2.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C476A904; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:21:06 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <3CFCCD1B.5080803@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 17:22:19 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Reply-To: jari.arkko@piuha.net
Organization: None
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011014
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rob Phillips <rob@netrake.com>
Cc: sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-sec-agree-02.txt
References: <7E06D3212981524CA10D2A114937C414093A6F@NREXCH.netrake.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= version=2.20
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Rob Phillips wrote: > In section 3.3 "Syntax": > > 1. The SIP specification already has a rule named "algorithm": see section 25.1 "Basic Rules" in bis-09. To avoid conflict, I would propose changing the name for this rule. > > 2. While there is no rule called "extension" in the SIP spec, I would suggest changing the name of this rule as well to be consistent with other rules that use "extension" in the name. I agree. Thanks for observing this. Jari _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-sec-agree-02.txt Rob Phillips
- Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-sec-agree-02… Jari Arkko