Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK

Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com> Wed, 09 March 2011 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7643A68DE for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lS2rS19rZYV for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:32:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BE23A67C3 for <sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so247680wwa.13 for <sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:33:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GkIHtws0KHcrNSoz3Ko58nUXDgLjv5zAt8Kf/Zbc/CU=; b=fu5dxGCoErRo0Xau5fbBqyhMIJj4AF+qfPolnEu450icA3nhQ358vcM5wIHU5MQW7w 16FPdZbHBQ2hqP14Ukaak8XUJOF/vBc4QXcFU+0h90KjKwHlq9TTqEX6Eidk6oJTlLWb Y6ynAlr1/klVaMRXgmGNnEkDp7tX13A3IkaJo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=DEc5n8na04nec0BmuKymOasL8Qtufqx3Iz19g6HsR9sGCY3jwq7B+XTwHA0UtZKPkJ IZjPm5WTDNFB8q/kE4jxrI94KZ+llaOU44ZeTNnRFgJ3/NmxEophFsxzkuDQxV+ADzpS O74sV+q5qMGXxcbJ6d1gWn7jAGlmczpDbjKxg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.79.11 with SMTP id h11mr5225050wee.77.1299663207808; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:33:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.93.147 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:33:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E13C8C03049AFA4E9CEE5A21D3E7F85DB51531B3@GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM>
References: <AANLkTimQfN_1sMhtxjgQOoTWTz_wHJf86Nyu7_L17MkS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinfNaFy3F0BAf8Pe00hiNTFMFsBApxZzNOUW1nK@mail.gmail.com> <E13C8C03049AFA4E9CEE5A21D3E7F85DB51531B3@GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:33:27 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTik5eKMvETfbFZQiZDW=ZbQ=CHwbFh+D1S4dTXd-@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
To: Ashish Saxena <ashish2.saxena@aricent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0ce0d120d44396049e096bb8"
Cc: sip@ietf.org, sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:32:14 -0000

Hello Ashish,

Here is the mline for both the messages.

183:

Media Description, name and address (m): audio 43888 RTP/AVP 18

200 OK:

Media Description, name and address (m): audio 43888 RTP/AVP 18

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Ashish Saxena <ashish2.saxena@aricent.com>wrote:

> what is the mline of 200OK SDP.
>
> Regards
> Ashish Saxena
> (www.aricent.com)
> ________________________________________
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin
> Kapoor [nitinkapoorr@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 12:54 PM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK
>
> Hello All,
>
> Could any one please help me out on requested query as below.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com
> <mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have one call scenario where my termination is sending the SDP in 183 as
> well as in 200 OK also. As far as i know if we are getting SDP in 183
> session progress then my UAC can ignore the SDP in 200 OK. Also most of the
> time SDP is same.
>
> But here i noticed the slight difference of "Session Version". Here when my
> termination is sending 188 Session Progress with SDP is sending the SDP as
> below.
>
> I can see that  my Termination is incrementing  "Session Version" for SDP
> in 183 & 200 OK in same dialog..
>
> 183 with SDP
>
> S_OWNER : o=TLPMSXP2 22660 22660 IN IP4 69.90.230.210
> S_NAME : s=sip call
> S_CONNECT : c=IN IP4 69.90.230.217
> TIME : t=0 0
> M_NAME : m=audio 59072 RTP/AVP 18 4 8 98
>
> 200 OK with SDP:
>
> S_OWNER : o=TLPMSXP2 22660 22661 IN IP4 69.90.230.210
> S_NAME : s=sip call
> S_CONNECT : c=IN IP4 69.90.230.217
> TIME : t=0 0
>
> Could anyone please let me know if that is okay to increment the session
> version and if any supported document is there?
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin
>
>
> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain
> privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used
> for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this
> message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
> the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from
> virus."
>