[Sip] ID updated: draft-kaplan-sip-baiting-attack-02.txt

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Fri, 22 February 2008 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C04128C38C; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjM6S-GRYKXG; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16C53A6CC1; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97E13A6CBD for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIff3NKmGTE8 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (host6.216.41.24.conversent.net [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE1D28C2B6 for <sip@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:31:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:30:46 -0500
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.7]) by mail.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.7]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:30:46 -0500
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: IETF SIP List <sip@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:31:00 -0500
Thread-Topic: ID updated: draft-kaplan-sip-baiting-attack-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ach1eLC7qg4PteusQY6RHwjdjmacMQ==
Message-ID: <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BC713E06B@mail.acmepacket.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: [Sip] ID updated: draft-kaplan-sip-baiting-attack-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

FYI, the draft on the Baiting attack with RFC4474 has been updated:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kaplan-sip-baiting-attack-02.txt

I changed section 12.1 possible solution to the problem of the request being delivered to unintended recipients.

This new solution only works for true SIP ends, vs. to a PSTN-gateway, but based on the mailing list discussion so far that appears to be a behavior the WG may want in the end.
(Personally I feel one might as well then only make RFC4474 work for SIPS URIs with S/MIME bodies, but that's just personal opinion)

-hadriel

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip