RE: [Sip] RFC 3608 on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension Header Field for Service Route Discovery During Registration

Dean, Bernie,

This may seem a silly question (I'm sure I will be told that it is ;-),
BUT I was wondering why the use of the 'Supported/Require' headers are
not required with this extension.

Regards,

Chris.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
>Sent: 09 October 2003 01:01
>Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; sip@ietf.org
>Subject: [Sip] RFC 3608 on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension
>Header Field for Service Route Discovery During Registration
>
>
>A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
>        RFC 3608
>
>        Title:      Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension Header
>                    Field for Service Route Discovery During
>                    Registration
>        Author(s):  D. Willis, B. Hoeneisen
>        Status:     Standards Track
>        Date:       October 2003
>        Mailbox:    dean.willis@softarmor.com, hoeneisen@switch.ch
>        Pages:      17
>        Characters: 35628
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:    None
>
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-sip-scvrtdisco-04.txt
>
>        URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3608.txt
>

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip