IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition

"Attila Sipos" <attila.sipos@vegastream.com> Wed, 09 March 2011 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <attila.sipos@vegastream.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C98A3A6928 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9GOg85OORDK for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cluster-f.mailcontrol.com (cluster-f.mailcontrol.com [85.115.62.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5D23A68CF for <sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rly21f.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly21f.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id p29ID7vS029176 for <sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:13:18 GMT
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly21f.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id p29ICKKO021980 for <sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:12:20 GMT
Received: from exsmtp02.nasstar-t1.net (exsmtp02.nasstar-t1.net [89.28.233.152]) by rly21f-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender <attila.sipos@vegastream.com>) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id p29ICGFi021614; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:12:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from EXVS02.nasstar-t1.net ([10.2.10.104]) by exsmtp02.nasstar-t1.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:15:24 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:12:15 -0000
Message-ID: <680808427CF931459462C3D78CB5EC600BFCEA79@EXVS02.nasstar-t1.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBQ+U7g6uU4g4AVT-UQZdtO=nM74StDk7G_gz5@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition
Thread-Index: Acveg68aWRI22h/6TWKKNoOKhxJZAgAASUoA
From: Attila Sipos <attila.sipos@vegastream.com>
To: isshed <isshed.sip@gmail.com>, discussion-bounces@sipforum.org, sip-implementors <sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, sip@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2011 18:15:24.0729 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5DFC290:01CBDE85]
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A_10_80_00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.70.1.131
Subject: Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:12:13 -0000

Strictly, for an error like that, there should be a "404 Bad Request"
response
but you might decide it is better to treat it as if it is missing:

   If the Content-Disposition header field is missing, bodies of
   Content-Type application/sdp imply the disposition "session", while
   other content types imply "render".


In this case, I think I would opt for a 404 response and then
inform the UA vendors that their UA is misbehaving.

regards
Attila



-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
isshed
Sent: 09 March 2011 17:55
To: discussion-bounces@sipforum.org; sip-implementors; sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition

If this header in initial invite and parsing fails. does the call get
connected?

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:16 PM, isshed <isshed.sip@gmail.com> wrote:

> does anyone know what the behaviour if parsing of Content-Disposition 
> header fails.
>
> Thanks,
> HArendra
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email