RE: [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance

"Drage, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 25 April 2007 09:52 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgeAU-0005H0-JS; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:52:10 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HgeAR-0005Gm-VR for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:52:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgeAR-0005Ge-J5 for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:52:07 -0400
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([135.245.0.33]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgeAQ-0000sJ-4R for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:52:07 -0400
Received: from ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-2.lucent.com [135.3.39.2]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id l3P9pq40006670; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:52:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DEEXP01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.65]) by ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:51:58 -0500
Received: from DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.26]) by DEEXP01.de.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:51:53 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:51:51 +0200
Message-ID: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180010846EE@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <462F00A8.60605@gmx.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance
Thread-Index: AceHCfgZEmnUmbw7STSQyNciveroowAFQNKg
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180FFE84C@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001084501@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <XFE-RTP-202ez1enAqp000045d8@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com> <462F00A8.60605@gmx.net>
From: "Drage, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2007 09:51:53.0333 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A601250:01C7871F]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a1852b4f554b02e7e4548cc7928acc1f
Cc: IETF SIP List <sip@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

Then you need to tell me what is missing - as does anyone else who posted comments.

I believe I took all the comments from both your comments on -05 and the new ones on -07. Obviously I had to add the classification because you in general omitted it. In general I also had to try and identify section numbers as well.

(Now if you had followed the instructions in the original posting as to presentation it would have made my job easier and less likely to error.)

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 8:18 AM
> Cc: Drage, Keith (Keith); IETF SIP List
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance
> 
> Hi Keith,
> 
> I took a look at the webpage
> (http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/reviews/location-conveyance/lo
> cation-conveyance-comments-r1.htm)
> and I noticed that only minor editorial comments were 
> captured on your webpage.
> I believe that the technical comments are more important. 
> Should they also be added to the page?
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> James M. Polk wrote:
> > 1st half of the list from me (it's 12:30am and time for bed)
> >
> > At 12:38 PM 4/24/2007, Drage, Keith \(Keith\) wrote:
> >> A reminder of the call tomorrow, and also that I have posted an 
> >> updated set of comments including some late comments received.
> >>
> >> The numbering remains consistent for the comments that were 
> >> previously posted, and we will refer to comments by 
> numbers on the call tomorrow.
> >
> > IMO, these points should be discussed on the call:
> >
> > 2, 3, 7, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 43A, 61A, 
> 64, 73, 74, 
> > 76, 78, 79, 80, 84/85, 88, .......................
> >
> > ....more coming in the morning
> >
> > These points are "maybes" for the call:
> >
> > 6, 10, 23, 31A, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 
> , , , , , 
> > , , , , , , , , ,
> >
> > ....more coming in the morning
> >
> >
> >
> >> Keith
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@alcatel-lucent.com]
> >> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:13 PM
> >> > To: IETF SIP List
> >> > Subject: [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance
> >> >
> >> > I have posted the comments from WGLC on 
> >> > draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance at:
> >> >
> >> > 
> http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/reviews/location-conveyance/index.ht
> >> > ml
> >> >
> >> > Please let me know if I have missed any comments.
> >> >
> >> > There will be a review conference call of these comments on:
> >> >
> >> > Wednesday 25th April at
> >> >
> >> >       1:00 pm - 3:00 pm Central US time
> >> >       2:00 pm - 4:00 pm Eastern US time
> >> >       7:00 pm - 9:00 pm UK time
> >> >       8:00 pm - 10:00 pm Central Europe time
> >> >
> >> > Bridge details:
> >> >
> >> > Chairperson Name:  KEITH DRAGE
> >> > Access Phone Number:  8007718734
> >> > International Access Phone Number:  +1 6477233953 
> 7-Digit Access Code:
> >> > 5776249
> >> >
> >> > While this call is in no sense restricted, this call is 
> for people 
> >> > who have reviewed the document. If you think you 
> qualify, and have 
> >> > not sent comments that are included above, or indeed 
> reviewed and 
> >> > had no comments, then please send me a mail indicating this.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > Keith
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> >> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> >> > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on 
> current sip Use 
> >> > sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> >> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> >> sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use 
> >> sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use 
> > sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip