Re: [SIP] 3PCC and the re-invite response

"Brett Tate" <brett@broadsoft.com> Fri, 01 December 2000 23:50 UTC

Received: from lists.bell-labs.com (share.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.58]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id SAA04479 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:50:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from share.research.bell-labs.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lists.bell-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9532644483; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:33:12 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: sip@lists.bell-labs.com
Received: from broadsoft.com (broadsoft.com [161.58.239.68]) by lists.bell-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264DD4444D for <sip@lists.bell-labs.com>; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:26:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tate ([64.241.199.106]) by broadsoft.com (8.8.8) id SAA21906; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:26:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <0da901c05bee$749c5380$4301a8c0@broadsoft.com>
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
To: Igor Slepchin <ISlepchin@dynamicsoft.com>, Sip Mail List <sip@lists.bell-labs.com>
References: <B65B4F8437968F488A01A940B21982BF3CE98B@DYN-EXCH-001.dynamicsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [SIP] 3PCC and the re-invite response
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: sip-admin@lists.bell-labs.com
Errors-To: sip-admin@lists.bell-labs.com
X-BeenThere: sip@lists.bell-labs.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@lists.bell-labs.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@lists.bell-labs.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@lists.bell-labs.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: IETF SIP Mailing List <sip.lists.bell-labs.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@lists.bell-labs.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.bell-labs.com/pipermail/sip/
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:28:48 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>
> What I'm saying is that I don't see this as a problem with 3pcc at all.
> Given Figure 1 in
> http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-sip-3pcc-01.txt,
why
> would A change the media in 200OK to the second INVITE? Instead of
inventing
> workarounds for eccentric UAs, it would be much easier to define what a
> "sane" UA can and cannot do (e.g., it cannot change SDP just because it
> received a re-INVITE, there should be another valid reason for the
change).
>

The main reason during call setup is because
codecs and other stuff may not have been
fully negotiated.  Another reason is because
many current UA's respond to hold SDP with
hold SDP.  Thus both sides would be passing
hold SDP with 0.0.0.0 as connection addresses,
and the call would not get established.

After a call has been established, the
SDP-change-loop can occur if one of the sides
chooses not to use the SDP information that it
used prior to the hold.  Many current
implementation tend to use a different port when
coming off hold, thus the race condition tends
to occur often.


_______________________________________________
SIP mailing list
SIP@lists.bell-labs.com
http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/sip