Re: [Sip] Update to RFC3329, aka Security Agreement

Hi Aki;

 I just want to thank you for coming up with this draft. I heard some
complaints resulting from the current RFC due to the lack of clarity and
hopefully this is going to solve some of the reoccurring issues due to the
lack of clarity.

 Regards
  Shida

Aki Niemi wrote:
> All,
>
> During the past couple of years, there have been a few reported issues
> on RFC 3329, based on implementation experience.
>
> I've gathered the set of issues in an I-D:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-niemi-rfc3329-issues-00.txt
>
> We've already talked about rfc3329bis among the authors, and we feel
> this would be appropriate in order to straighten out the issues and
> improve interop. Any comments are welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Aki
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip