Re: [Sip] draft-sparks-sip-nit-problems-02

On Nov 22, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Bharrat, Shaun wrote:

> Hi:
>
> I lost track of the discussion on problems with the non-INVITE  
> transaction.
> The latest draft version I could find has now expired. Can someone  
> please
> point me to a email archive, meeting minutes, etc that describes the
> final outcome or prescription? (I am particularly interested in the  
> current
> recommendation on sending provisional responses for the non-INVITE
> transaction.)
>

Using the IETF draft tracker at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi

I see that:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-sip-nit-problems-02.txt

and

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-sip-nit-actions-03.txt

have been approved by the IESG and are in the RFC Editor's queue,

Once a draft has entered this state, it doesn't "expire" even if it  
persists past the date on the draft. This is important, since drafts  
normally expire after six months, and the queue is longer than that.

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip