[Sip] 302 question

Mihaly Zachar <zmihaly@madein.hu> Tue, 02 October 2007 17:33 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iclct-0002Np-D2; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:43 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iclcr-0002Nd-Ow for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:41 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iclcr-0002NU-Ep for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:41 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iclbc-0006nA-4X for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:32:24 -0400
Received: from new.madein.hu ([195.56.146.170]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iclbb-00035j-Cv for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:32:24 -0400
Received: from new.madein.hu (madein [127.0.0.1]) by new.madein.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6461A2FDA for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by new.madein.hu (Postfix, from userid 103) id E7BE83470; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:32:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on madein
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [10.177.177.1] (dsl5400B3F8.pool.t-online.hu [84.0.179.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by new.madein.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA90B2FDA for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:32:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <470280C2.3040907@madein.hu>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:32:50 +0200
From: Mihaly Zachar <zmihaly@madein.hu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sip@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
X-TMDA-Confirmed: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:41 -0400
Subject: [Sip] 302 question
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

I'm writing an UAS.

The UAS has a feature, that if the called number is matching with a 
pattern, it will send 183 Session in progress, than plays an RTP stream 
and then redirect the UAC with 302 Moved Temporarily..

There is an UAC, and it's developers says that I should not send 302 
Redirect after the 183 Session in progress.

This solution works well with CISCO media gateways.

I could not find the exact paraghaph about it in the RFC 3261.

Can sy help me in this ?


So, the call flow is the following:

UAC                      UAS
     --- INVITE --->
     <--- 100 ------
     <--- 183 ------
     <-- RTP --
          .
          .
          .
     <--- 302 ----


Is this correct ?


Thanks,
Misi



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip