[Sip] Via branch value in retransission procedure
"Paradiso, Francesco" <Francesco_Paradiso@alliedtelesis.com> Mon, 14 May 2007 10:58 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnYGY-00058M-3r; Mon, 14 May 2007 06:58:58 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8S2-0004cD-Lf for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:12:58 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8S2-0004c5-CS for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:12:58 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8RL-0004Vd-6K for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:12:15 -0400
Received: from mail44.messagelabs.com ([216.82.249.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8RH-0005HU-Or for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:12:15 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Francesco_Paradiso@alliedtelesis.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-44.messagelabs.com!1178802728!26832437!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [212.177.57.74]
Received: (qmail 6399 invoked from network); 10 May 2007 13:12:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO alliedtelesis.com) (212.177.57.74) by server-14.tower-44.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 10 May 2007 13:12:10 -0000
Received: from svr-mila-e2k1.atg.lc ([10.17.39.14] RDNS failed) by alliedtelesis.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 10 May 2007 15:15:40 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:12:08 +0200
Message-ID: <563047DA3F61634180B39CD3E27D38441A74E5@svr-mila-e2k1.atg.lc>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Via branch value in retransission procedure
Thread-Index: AceTBM+13dJbEmLiS8OP5KIw0iWZag==
From: "Paradiso, Francesco" <Francesco_Paradiso@alliedtelesis.com>
To: sip@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2007 13:15:40.0847 (UTC) FILETIME=[4EBCE3F0:01C79305]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c
X-TMDA-Confirmed: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:12:58 -0400
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 May 2007 06:58:57 -0400
Subject: [Sip] Via branch value in retransission procedure
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1674345869=="
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all, is correct that on every retransmit, the CSeq is incremented and the Via branch parameter is changed? Thanks in Advance Best Regards Francesco
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Via branch value in retransission procedure Paradiso, Francesco
- RE: [Sip] Via branch value in retransission proce… Rayees Khan