RE: [Sip] Is the Join draft ready for WGLC?

I have no problem with the last call. This is an excellent basic approach,
though some more complexity may be required in practice. For example, if the
3rd party joins an existing conference, a password and URL may also be
required to join the webshare or data collaboration part of the conference.

Would it be useful to include such an example in some related document? A
topic for the XCON contributors?

Thanks, Henry

Henry Sinnreich

MCI
400 International Parkway
Richardson, Texas 75081
USA

Have you disconnected the PBX?

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-admin@ietf.org [mailto:sip-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rohan Mahy
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:37 PM
To: sip@ietf.org
Cc: rohan@cisco.com
Subject: [Sip] Is the Join draft ready for WGLC?

Hi,

I have looked through my notes and I don't see any open issues 
regarding the Join draft.  The document contains additional 
authorization language, it includes a reference to callee-caps for the 
isFocus parameter and is aligned with the conferencing framework and 
cc-conferencing, but does not depend on them. Unless someone can come 
up with a good reason to delay this draft, I will ask Dean to issue a 
WGLC on it.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-join-02.txt

many thanks,
-rohan

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip