Re: [sip]Join header syntax related to RFC2543

Rohan Mahy <rohan@ekabal.com> Sat, 25 September 2004 20:03 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA14736 for <sip-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:03:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBItF-0000Wc-V2 for sip-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:11:30 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBIaf-0005tx-Sa; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:52:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAWNU-0003kZ-TO for sip@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:23:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27343 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from figas.ekabal.com ([157.22.13.42]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAWUJ-0003KB-Bg for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:30:31 -0400
Received: from [131.161.248.87] (open-131-161-248-87.cliq.com [131.161.248.87]) (authenticated) by figas.ekabal.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8NGNKc03538; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:23:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4152E5C6.4020905@softarmor.com>
References: <20040902001944.8D2B93D0FB@ms2.alpha.co.jp> <4152E5C6.4020905@softarmor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Message-Id: <ED8EDB85-0D7C-11D9-A91D-0003938AF740@ekabal.com>
From: Rohan Mahy <rohan@ekabal.com>
Subject: Re: [sip]Join header syntax related to RFC2543
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:23:39 -0700
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a8041eca2a724d631b098c15e9048ce9
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:52:12 -0400
Cc: dpetrie@pingtel.com, Rohan Mahy <rohan@ekabal.com>, sip@ietf.org, 石川 愛 <ishikame@alpha.co.jp>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0235458443=="
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bc6181926481d86059e678c9f7cb8b34

Hi,

The intent of the text is that either the to-tag or the from-tag 
parameter could match a null tag.  Examples are non-normative, so they 
should not limit what you can do.  The normative text intentionally 
says "a tag" and does not specify what kind of tag.

I'm assuming the following text would clarify things appropriately.

    For compatibility with ... RFC 2543 compliant UAs,
    a to-tag of zero matches both a to-tag value of
    zero and a null to-tag.  Likewise, a from-tag of zero
    matches both a to-tag value of zero and a null from-tag.

I might even be able to get this text into Replaces as well.

thanks,
-rohan



On Sep 23, 2004, at 8:03 AM, Dean Willis wrote:

> 石川 愛 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question associated with draft-ietf-sip-join-03.txt
>> and draft-ietf-sip-replaces-05.txt.
>>
>>
>> Join document at the tail of Section 7.1  saids:
>>
>> For compatibility with dialogs initiated by RFC2543 [11]
>> compliant UAs, a tag of zero matches both tags of zero and null tags
>>
>> Examples:
>>       Join: 87134@192.0.2.23;to-tag=24796;from-tag=0 
>>
>> and also said at section 6.1 in Replaces document.
>>
>>
>>
>> In inverse case, i.e., there is a dialog initiated by RFC3261
>> compliant UAs to RFC2543 compliant UAs, is the same?
>> In other words, there is a possibility that there is
>> no to-tag in this case. So we can as below?
>>
>> For example,
>>       Join: 12345@192.1.2.3;to-tag=0;from-tag=56789
>>
>>
>> In this example, does tag of zero matches both tags of zero
>> and null tags? And also for Replaces?
>
> That's my reading of the doc, although in retrospect the wording at the
> end of joing-7.1 is particularly clumsy, and I wish somebody had 
> noticed
> sooner.
>
> I'd like to ask the authors to clarify here, and perhaps we can get an
> errata entry with that clarification.
>
> --
> Dean
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip