[Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 10 October 2011 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB74521F8A7D for <sip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpLo8Tfp163I for <sip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FD421F8CB5 for <sip@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2025498C274; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: fluffy@cisco.com, jason.fischl@skype.net, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, dean.willis@softarmor.com, drage@alcatel-lucent.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20111010190013.2025498C274@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sip@ietf.org, oej@edvina.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988)
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:00:22 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6072,
"Certificate Management Service for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6072&eid=2988

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Olle E. Johansson <oej@edvina.net>

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
   The [RFC4474] authentication service defined a signature algorithm
   based on SHA-1 called rsa-sha1.  This specification adds a signature
   algorithm that is roughly the same but based on SHA-256 and called
   rsa-sha256.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The [RFC4474] authentication service defined a signature algorithm
   based on SHA-1 called rsa-sha1.  This specification adds a signature
   algorithm that is roughly the same but based on SHA-256 and called
   rsa-sha256. This is an update of RFC 4474.

Notes
-----
The Masthead doesn't indicate clearly that this RFC updates 4474 and thus the IETF tools web site doesn't indicate that 4474 is updated.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6072 (draft-ietf-sip-certs-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Certificate Management Service for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Publication Date    : February 2011
Author(s)           : C. Jennings, J. Fischl, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Session Initiation Protocol
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG