[Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 10 October 2011 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id EB74521F8A7D for <sip@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpLo8Tfp163I for
<sip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FD421F8CB5 for <sip@ietf.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2025498C274;
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: fluffy@cisco.com, jason.fischl@skype.net, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com,
rjsparks@nostrum.com, dean.willis@softarmor.com, drage@alcatel-lucent.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20111010190013.2025498C274@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sip@ietf.org, oej@edvina.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988)
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:00:22 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6072, "Certificate Management Service for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6072&eid=2988 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Olle E. Johansson <oej@edvina.net> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- The [RFC4474] authentication service defined a signature algorithm based on SHA-1 called rsa-sha1. This specification adds a signature algorithm that is roughly the same but based on SHA-256 and called rsa-sha256. Corrected Text -------------- The [RFC4474] authentication service defined a signature algorithm based on SHA-1 called rsa-sha1. This specification adds a signature algorithm that is roughly the same but based on SHA-256 and called rsa-sha256. This is an update of RFC 4474. Notes ----- The Masthead doesn't indicate clearly that this RFC updates 4474 and thus the IETF tools web site doesn't indicate that 4474 is updated. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6072 (draft-ietf-sip-certs-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management Service for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Publication Date : February 2011 Author(s) : C. Jennings, J. Fischl, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Session Initiation Protocol Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988) RFC Errata System